Female Rulers in


The Duchess of Malfi
by John Webster

character summary | women as rulers
Queen Elizabeth | the Duchess and Ferdinand
trials & tribulations | powerful women: an anomaly | links, credits, etc.

"The birds that live i' th' field
On the wild benefit of nature, live
Happier than we; for they may choose their mates,
And carol their sweet pleasures to the spring."
The Duchess of Malfi (3.5.18-21)

The Duchess of Malfi: Character Summary

A widow, the duchess rules her duchy alone. Lonely and in love, she secretly marries her steward Antonio. This is done in a hand-fast marriage witnessed by Cariola, the Duchess' hand-maiden. By choosing to marry Antonio in secret, the Duchess neglects her duty to her people. When she begins getting pregnant and giving birth, her people denounce her as a strumpet. They then lose their respect for their leader. The pilgrims in Act 4 (when the Duchess and her family are in Loreto at the religous shrine) are the only disinterested parties in the play. They are also the only disinterested commoners.
back to top

"That's the greatest torture souls feel in hell,
In hell: that they must live, and cannot die."
The Duchess of Malfi (4.1.70-71)

Renaissance woman

Women as Rulers

Women rulers and the circumstances they deal with are very much unlike men rulers and their situations. The women must worry about society's propensities, their own feelings, and the welfare of their people. It is much more difficult to be a woman in power than to be a man in power. The choices women rulers make cannot be only for themselves, and one wrong decision can spell disaster. Interested in women's courtly power and influence?
back to top

"A count! He's a mere stick of sugar-candy,
You may look quite through him. When I choose
A husband, I will marry for your honor."

The Duchess of Malfi (3.1.43-45)

The Real-life Duchess of Malfi: Queen Elizabeth

Queen Elizabeth I ruled over England alone. She never married, choosing to claim instead that she was married to her country. By doing this, Elizabeth retained her authority and she was not forgotten behind the name of a man. In spite of this, though, or perhaps because of it, she endeared herself to her people. The Duchess, choosing love, chooses her downfall. The Queen Elizabeth, choosing duty (her throne), chooses the path to immortality.
back to top

"I am acquainted with sad misery,
As the tanned galley-slave is with his oar.
Necessity makes me suffer constantly,
And custom makes it easy."

The Duchess of Malfi (4.2.27-30)

The Duchess and Ferdinand

Incest, as a motive, was used extensively in various Elizabethan /Jacobean plays including Hamlet, A King & No King, and ‘Tis Pity She’s a Whore. Incest is merely implied in The Duchess of Malfi because the queer nature of the play does not allow it to become an absolute. Evidence supports the idea that Webster would like his audience to view Ferdinand’s rage against his sister’s remarriage stemming from a feeling of incest that even he himself may not recognize (Leech 57).

Instances of Ferdinand’s incestuous feelings occur throughout the play. In Act I, for instance, Ferdinand speaks offensively toward his sister finally calling her a "lusty widow" (I, ii). In response to the Duchess’ remarriage, he treats her with continued scorn & violent behavior. When the true identity of her husband is discovered, Ferdinand opts to wait until the Duchess is dead before attempting to kill Antonio. Ferdinand’s use of dead man’s hand ["Here’s a hand/ To which you have vowed much love; the ring upon’t/ You gave" (IV.i)] suggests a sort of phallic significance (Leech 58).

"When Fortune's wheel is overcharged with princes,
The weight makes it move swift."

The Duchess of Malfi (3.5.96-97)

Renaissance painting

Ferdinand’s last words hint at his possible recognition of his incestuous feeling where he says, "My Sister, O my sister! there’ s the cause on’t. / Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, / Like Diamonds, we are cut with our own dust" (V.v). His final statement brings the reader back to Act I where the Duchess says, "Diamonds are of most value / They say, that have passed through most jewellers’ [sic] hands" (I.ii). Where the Duchess earlier likens herself to a diamond, Ferdinand is cut by her dust. This may suggest that he acknowledges his destruction by the dust that both he & his sister share (because of their blood relation). While Ferdinand accepts his downfall, it is doubtful that he could have reached a full understanding of his feelings due in part to his sickening state of mind near the time of his death.
back to top

The Trials and Tribulations of Life for Women in the 16th and 17th Centuries

In the early modern period, the position of women was contradictory and constantly shifting. At this time, the beliefs of the Roman Catholic doctrines and the beliefs of the Protestant faith were at odds with each other. This battle for supremacy betwee n the two faiths helped to cause the turmoil of the early woman’s position. On the one hand, for Roman Catholics, the woman who remained a virgin was a "special" (Jankowski, 26) being and all other women were seen as somehow lesser, corrupted beings. Ma rried women were necessary for multiplication of the human race but also tainted because of this activity. The Protestant view of virginal women and married women was different. Single women were seen as having a handicap that could only be remedied th rough the process of marriage. There was an honorable and acceptable position for single women in the Catholic faith: the nun. She had some power over herself. In the Protestant faith, the only honorable position for a woman was marriage and, to a lesser degree, widowhood. These contradictory views made a woman’s position ambivalen t.

However, it must be noted that despite the shifting religious views of the period, the 16th and 17th centuries were definitely patriarchal societies, with the father/husband seen as the supreme ruler of his children/wives. A single woman was subject to t he rule of her father until her majority. Most women were married before her majority. There were certain societal functions in place to assure the marriage of a woman before her majority. She was jeered at and made to feel socially unacceptable if she reached her majority unmarried. Names such as "old maid" and "spinster" were used to denigrate her status and encourage her to marry. Her chastity was often questioned . As a single, unmarried woman, she could not own or sell property, draw up her wi ll or initiate law suits (Jankowski, 24). Every possible device was used by society to pressure a single woman into marriage.

During this period, there were three types of women: single women, married women and widowed women. As noted above, the single woman was considered her father’s chattel and under heavy pressure to marry. Only through marriage did she gain any measure of power and control, and then usually only over her own household. Even with marriage, a woman held no legal identity or rights. Widows, on the other hand, did have legal identities and legal rights(Jankowski, 36).

Widows were exceptions or anomalies to the 16th and 17th century patriarchal society. A widow was considered an "ungoverned woman" who challenged and threatened societal norms of the period (Jankowski, 35). A widow had legal rights that single and marr ied women did not have. A widow never directly inherited land, though she could hold it for a minor son. She had the legal right to control her properties in her own or her children’s interests (Jankowski, 35). She could draw up her own will. A widow was free to choose her next husband, while a never-married woman usually had her prospective husband chosen for her. The knowledge that with remarriage came the loss of these legal rights caused many women to decide against remarriage. Since the widow wa s often seen as "ungoverned" and "threatening" to current social norms, societal pressure was put on the widow to remarry or be considered sexually promiscuous and often called a whore. Never-married and widowed women were discriminated against and made to feel inferior to married women.
back to top

Powerful Women in the 16th and 17th Centuries: An Anomaly

For many people during this early modern period, powerful women were considered unnatural and dangerous. The image of female dominance is an image of social disorder (Jankowski, 55). The patriarchal society of the time was a society in which all levels of the society looked towards a male figure as the one who holds supreme power (Jankowski, 55). Powerful women were therefore often denigrated and seen as dysfunctional. Despite having experienced three reigning monarchs during this period, Mary Stuart, Mary Tudor and Elizabeth Tudor, there was still a feeling of uneasiness among the general population at the thought of these women rulers.

To be successful and powerful during this time, a woman had to embody many contradictory qualities. She had to have so-called "manly" intelligence, yet still appear motherly and feminine. She had to be both tough and yet submissive. However, a powerful woman of this period also had to walk a fine line. Political acumen was a must. She could not go too far beyond social norms. If she became too subversive or radical, she was often punished severely. Therefore, a powerful woman had to know how accomplish her objectives within t he boundaries of social limits.
back to top

Home Links Credits and Resources Back to 434 class page